Happy Zombie Jesus Day
Well, it’s that time of year again — the long-weekend that a number of Western nations observe as a national holiday: the pagan festival of ?ostre, better known as Easter, where millions of people gleefully glorify in the brutal killing of their god, who was the son of their god sent by their god to cleanse the world from sins stipulated by their god, for the appeasement of their god.
I have a computer wallpaper that describes it succinctly:
Christianity, n.: Sending telepathic messages to a Jewish ghost letting him know that you will accept him as your master and to ask him to remove a magical curse that was passed down to you because an old woman that was made from the rib of her partner ate a piece of magical fruit from a magical tree because a talking snake told her to.
Ask me again why I’m an Atheist?
Those who recognise that monotheism is one god too many, know it as:
Zombie Jesus Day!
The Parody
According to popular culture and today’s political-religious voices, this holiday all began with…

…the death of a Jewish martyr named Eashoa or Yashua (depending upon which etymology you follow) — who most people know by his translated name of Jesus or Isa — around 2,000 years ago. And then a few days later, it ended with…

…the apparent resurrection of the martyr to the least objective audience possible: Mary Magdalene, sometimes considered to be a love interest or equal leader. Major opposition to this last point is usually from the same people who naïvely think Jesus’s mother died a virgin. (All of this accepts, for the sake of argument, that the people in the story actually lived at that time, that Jesus was born to Mary, that he had a group of followers, etc).
Then some time afterwards, this strange and little-known sect was chosen to replace the polytheistic Roman pantheon as the official religion of the Roman Empire. The Roman Catholic Church was born, complete with its equally absurd Doctrine of the Trinity (one god is three gods but is really just one god — presumably to keep the polytheistic migrants from pantheism happy).
Protestants, particularly ones from modern fundamentalist sects, don’t like this fact but: Catholicism is Christianity. There was no distinction and, with the exception of the schism over the power of the Pope which lead to the formation of the Eastern Orthodox Church, it remained that way until the 16th century Reformation.
For those who haven’t yet completely signed over their rational and critical faculties, here’s the official story for those looking to join the club…

…and is only sanctified by you joining in the cannibalistic ritual of eating the god/man/father/son’s body and drinking his blood. No brains required. Brains…
The Reality
The festival of the Anglo-Saxon pagan goddess ?ostre (or Ôstarâ) celebrates the rebirth of life after the long cold winter by marking the coming of spring, and observes the lunar calendar (as seasonal events have done throughout much of civilisation). Most people know it as Easter, and have bought into the claim that it originated with the death of a religious fanatic around 2,000 years ago.
Easter did not originate with the death of Jesus any more than Christmas originated with his birth. As with most Christian holidays, it was piggy-backed onto pre-existing holidays of the culture in which it spread, and then was later enforced and rewritten by the Church as if the original never existed. Hence the ?ostre/spring symbolism and timing for Easter, and the Yule/winter solstice symbolism and timing for Christmas. Easter is timed to mark the end of Passover — a national & religious celebration of the story of a brutal god murdering thousands of innocent infants — making them follow a lunar, seasonal calendar. Hence the fact that both occur at seemingly random times between late March and late April, matching the Jewish month of Nisan (also called Aviv, or spring), marking the timing of the barley harvest. And don’t forget the Easter egg and its symbolism of new birth/life.
Rebirth, new life, resurrection… recognising an ongoing theme?
The Incredulity
I’ve clearly parodied the stories surrounding the crucifixion of Jesus, basing them in a more Catholic setting than Protestant as the former has been around the longest and the latter is cherry-picked from the former, but they serve to outline the outlandish beliefs surrounding the holiday being celebrated. I say celebrated, but the facts are that only a tiny percentage of the Christian population actually observe (or even know) all the requirements of this holiday, and the number of people who actually know the popularised Easter story is dwindling yearly. For most of the Western world, Easter is simply a 4-day long-weekend where we may have some nice meals and catch up with family, get away for a few days to the coast or snow, or do some DIY around the house to wash away the winter and prepare the house and garden for the coming spring and summer.
The latter is really what Easter is all about. We’ve come through the harsh winter, those of us left alive and healthy will now rebuild what winter has damaged, and life will begin again for the year — as can be seen all around with plant growth, spring lambs and the returned warmth of the Sun.
It’s a shame that some people voluntarily hang on to Bronze Age superstitions, from a time when humanity wasn’t enlightened enough to realise the reality of the annual wonders occurring around us this time of year. I understand why church and political leaders encourage and propagate such absurdities as it ensures their unrivalled power — particularly when you can threaten disobedience with eternal torture in a place that the threatened cannot be certain whether such an evil torment exists or not (enter the fallacy of Pascal’s Wager) — but for otherwise intelligent lay-people to do the same thing feels like collusion or appeasement. Something similar to knowing that you don’t need to outrun the lion chasing you to stay alive, merely that you have to outrun the person next to you. It’s a sick rationale from a sick system borne of sick minds.
Despite what believers reading this may think or say: I do not hate people of religion. I can respect the person while despising the belief, whether religious or political. Beliefs do not stop a person from being human, nor from being worthy of treatment as such. That’s the nature of secular humanism.
Humanity is more important than invisible friends.
loading...

“stipulated by their god, for the appeasement of their god…”
With all due respect, that’s not true at all. This is:
In the meantime, I offer the following brief (thus probably inadequate in many ways) explanation of Roman Catholicism:
God is love. Love is making a gift of yourself to another. Love is self-giving. The opposite of love is selfishness. Authentic love always exhibits 4 basic qualities; it is always free, total, faithful, and fruitful. Otherwise, is has been corrupted by selfishness, which makes one want to possess something/someone for one’s own pleasure.
God exists in a communion formed by self-giving love: the Trinity.
The Father begets the Son by loving him; the Son is begotten by the Father, letting himself be loved and receiving from him the capacity to love; the Holy Spirit is love given in total gratuitousness by the Father, received with full gratitude by the Son, and returned by him to the Father. – Pope John Paul II 7/29/98
God is not a solitude, but a family. — Pope John Paul II
Authentic love is always open to new life (i.e., fruitful).
God created man out of love.
God created man in his image and likeness.
God created man to share his divine life.
God’s hope (expectation?) was that man would live a life of perfect self-giving love in imitation of his creator.
Man would procreate, building a large family of God on earth, obedient and faithful in love to him and to each other.
True love gives total freedom to the other.
Man was completely free to choose to respond to God’s love and God’s plan by giving of himself to God in return.
Giving of himself to God would involve man’s obedience and faithfulness to God.
Man was disobedient and unfaithful to God (Adam & Eve…) (selfish).
God immediately promised a plan of salvation for man.
God begins to form a people [family/tribe/nation/kingdom] that will freely return his love and live in imitation of their creator.
God continued to reach out to his expanding family.
He sent a law for them to follow (Moses. 10 Commandments, etc.).
He sent prophets to them as his messengers.
But God’s people continually fell into a cycle of
Unfaithfulness / Tragedy / Repentance / Forgiveness / Faithfulness / Pride (forgetting God) / Unfaithfulness…
His people repeatedly fail to keep the law and be faithful to him (i.e., failed to love him in response to his love for them).
In the fullness of time, God sent his Son, Jesus, out of his love and his desire to see his people restored.
Jesus was perfectly faithful, obedient, humble, self-giving in love.
Jesus does what Israel (God’s chosen people) failed to do: he freely did only God’s will, which was primarily to proclaim the truth about the kingdom of God (and witness to it via signs and wonders – miracles, exorcisms, etc).
Jesus endured all the pain and suffering that came upon him because of his perfect faithfulness to the Father……to the point of death.
(His proclamation of the truth caused him to be hated by the religious authorities of his time. The more he proclaimed the truth and worked miracles (i.e., did God’s will, his mission in life), the more they hated him, until finally their selfishness caused them to kill him)
The only way that Jesus could have avoided being put to death would have been by selfishly being unfaithful to the will of his Father.
But Jesus freely chose death rather than unfaithfulness to God.
This is why his sacrifice is accepted by God in atonement for our sins: because, in his human nature, Jesus remained totally faithful to God.
By his sacrifice, Jesus cleared away the impediments to Divine Mercy for all of us.
Jesus won for us the grace which is necessary for us to be faithful to God.
We must come to God through Jesus – he wasn’t sent by the Father for nothing!!
We need the grace that Jesus won for us; we cannot be faithful by our own efforts.
Jesus rises from the dead to prove that life is eternal.
Together, the Father & Son send the Holy Spirit
Who brings God’s grace
And is God’s life in us
The Spirit is also the love and the personal gift which contains every created gift: life, grace and glory. The mystery of this communion shines forth in the Church, the Mystical Body of Christ, enlivened by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit himself makes us “one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:28) and thus integrates us within the same unity which binds the Son to the Father. We are left in wonder at this intense and intimate communion between God and us! – Pope John Paul II 7/29/98
Remember, God wants to form a people that will freely return his love and live in imitation of their creator. (vs establishing a written law to be followed)
Jesus came to restore the formation of this people, not just to write a book [the bible].
Church = family of God
A family of God’s creatures
A family with this common trait: acceptance of Jesus as their Savior
A family adopted by the Father
A family of people who will now use the grace that God now offers us through Jesus (sacraments, liturgy, etc.)
To enable us to be faithful
To freely choose to put him and others first
Despite any pain and suffering we must endure
Just like Jesus did!!
With all due respect, the Bible clearly states that God created everything, which means he also created the (mysteriously variable) rules of what is sin and what isn’t, which means that quote you’ve chosen is precisely accurate.
However, I suppose I should thank you for sharing that thoughtful, purely copy-and-pasted monologue. I had hoped the first response to this post would be by someone who had done more than simply scan for bits that didn’t tally with their dogma and then attempt to “set the record straight” by uploading their previously prepared “Internet refutation file,” but I’m often told I expect too much sometimes.
Surely you must realise that using the Bible as a proof of itself is logical lunacy, as is using any Pope’s “clarifications”, or do you simply not understand objectivity or the rational rules of argument? What you have done is no different to me writing a document declaring myself the returned Christ and, when you naturally challenge me (Ye of little faith!), for me to simply refer to the document as proof of my claim. The fact that I wrote the document recently and by contrast many people wrote the books of the Bible over a great expanse of time and that it’s believed my millions or billions doesn’t make it any more real. It’s a common mistake to think that “X million people can’t be wrong!” is a valid argument. It’s called the Argumentum ad Populum, and is the same trick used by late night infomercials, spammers and religious proselytisers worldwide. More typically referred to in advertising as testimonials, “I tried Acme’s Wedding Tackle Enlargement Cream and it worked for me!”
If you care to defend that position, consider for a moment the people of Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism and paganism. And please… don’t respond with Biblical, Papal or dogmatic refutations on why Christianity is right and “those other heathen” are wrong. You’ll be painting yourself into a corner.
Awesome, well-written post (as always!). Even as someone who isn’t an atheist, I really love reading your blog, since you’re actually open-minded and non-confrontational about everything.
Also, those macros are made of win
I’m very glad you like my post and blog, and that you recognise that it’s not designed to be offensive or maliciously confrontational. It is designed to be challenging, though, and I very much want believers (of any religion, creed or stripe) to consider it for a moment without the dogma they’ve been unquestioningly feeding on, in most cases, since before they learned to walk.
As a former believer I realise that it’s extremely difficult (perhaps impossible in some cases) for a dedicated believer to view this kind of topic with objectivity, but then this post will wait until that person reaches a point where the veneer of blind faith finally cracks and questions start to flow.
To which macros are you referring?